Kannathil Muthamittal

I watched Kannathil Muthamittal when a number of people recommended it to me after I worked in refugee camps in Sri Lanka. I think that my experiences there have really coloured my view of the film as I do focus more on Shyama’s story and less on the main characters. That said, I think the story is well told and the actors all do a good job – it’s just not the story I wanted to see.  It’s a classic Mani Ratnam film with strong female characters, great cinematography and attention to detail, so it’s no surprise that the film won six National Awards.

The film opens with the wedding of Shyama (Nandita Das) and Dileepan (J. D. Chakravarthi) in their village located in northern Sri Lanka. Despite this happy start it’s not long before Shyama is pregnant and on a boat heading for a refugee camp in India while her husband is missing, presumably fighting for the LTTE. Once she gives birth in the refugee camp, Shyama leaves her daughter behind and heads back to Sri Lanka to try and find her husband.

From here the film skips forward in time to introduce G. Thiruchelvan or Thiru (Madhavan) and his family, as seen through the eyes of his adopted daughter Amudha. Convincingly played by P S Keerthana, she appears to be a typical precocious 9 year old; playing with her friends at school, teasing her two younger brothers and very definitely the princess in the family. The story of her adoption is told in flashback and shows the development of the romance between Thiru and Indra (Simran).  I really like this part of the story as the two leads play their parts well and the intertwining of the adoption story and the romance is really sweet.

After she is told by her father on her ninth birthday that she is adopted, Amudha becomes moody and withdrawn and finally demands a chance to meet her real mother in Sri Lanka. For some inexplicable reason her parents accede to her demands and the family head off to the war-torn nation, although they did have the good sense to leave their other two sons behind.

The scenes in Sri Lanka make me cry every time I watch this film. I have seen the same mix of resignation and total despair on people’s faces that is shown here when a village is evacuated. I worked on the East Coast and regularly travelled between LTTE and government controlled areas. The incredibly young soldiers with their automatic weapons shown in the film is very much true to what I experienced and for me this total realism clashes with the more idealistic search for Shyama. Mani Ratnam wisely doesn’t attempt to explain any of the conflict, only showing its effects on Indra and Thiru as they realise why Shyama left her baby behind.

Amudha becomes bratty and rude as she deals with her feelings of alienation from her family and as a consequence I lose much of my sympathy for her. I also disagree with her parents’ decision to try and find her birth mother, no matter how essential it is to the plot. However both Simran and P S Keerthana convey their conflicting emotions and fluctuating relationship well and Indra’s  inner conflict as she worries about her two sons left behind in India is effectively depicted. Although Amudha is irritating the young actor does hold her own against the more experienced cast and it may be more due to the over emotional story that I lose interest in her search. Madhavan’s character, although impressive in the beginning, seems to have little impact in the latter half of the film and Prakash Raj is wasted in his role as the doctor taking the family around Colombo. So while I enjoy the first half of the film, the second half tends to drag with the adoption story and the peripheral action is more engaging . Some of Amudha’s rebellion in this section could have been cut without losing the feeling of her isolation and separation from the rest of the family. The ending is also a little disappointing but Mani Ratnam shows restraint in not turning the final scenes into melodrama, which could easily have occurred given the subject matter.

What I do like about the film is that it looks beautiful and is well shot by cinematographer Ravi K Chanran. Lighting is used to good effect as the early scenes in the family home are filled with warmth in contrast to the rain and grey skies in the later part of the film. While the background score of the film by A. R. Rahman is both beautiful and haunting, some of the songs are a little intrusive. The story doesn’t really need dance numbers and they seem to interrupt rather than move the film forward.

This isn’t a film I particularly enjoy watching, probably more because of the memories it evokes, although I can see why it won awards and I do think it’s generally well acted. It’s just that I would have preferred to see more of Shyama’s story and less of the family drama.  3 stars from me, mainly for the first half.

Temple says: This is one of the first Tamil films I saw a few years ago, and I was prompted to pick it up because of the storyline and for Madhavan.

Thiru (Madhavan) fell in love with the idea of giving Amudha a home and family, and I always feel that if Indra hadn’t agreed, then someone else would have been procured to play wifey. His decisions all revolve around what he wants – the way he courts Indra, the adoption, telling Amudha and persisting when it was clear she wasn’t ready for this birthday surprise, and on it goes.  The job of explaining and reassuring was left mostly to Indra, and she had to bear the emotional burden of seeing her little girl in torment as she herself struggled to cope. Simran is lovely as Indra, but her character is surprisingly weak considering the way she met Maddy, and her being a news anchor. I expected more backbone, but the women in Mani Ratnam films are often written like this – a strong outline and not a lot of finer detail to make them seem more real.

I was adopted and my mother told me every day, long before I even knew what words were, so it would never come as a shock to me and to make it clear that ‘adoption’ isn’t a dirty word. My perspective is coloured by that and while I can understand the bratty Amudha wanting to know her own story, I will never understand her adoptive parents taking her into a war zone no matter how much she sulked.  Still, the treatment of her story in terms of her developing understanding, the legal adoption process, and the fallout once the truth emerged was handled in a much more credible manner than many other films with orphans scattered around the streets, under cabbage leaves, going free to a good home.

The prologue was excellent in setting the scene, but beyond that Shyama and Dileepa didn’t really fit. The context of the Sri Lankan conflict added another dimension, but also made the second half of the film too dramatic and improbable when they went looking for Shyama. So although a fascinating and moving topic, here it is just used as a background for the  family weepfest.

The soundtrack works well in the film, but I find the songs bland. The picturisations are beautiful, most are very stylised, however I can only take so much fabric blowing around and children running on the beach. They suit the mood of the film, but having seen them before, I made a cup of tea during a couple of songs this time. I felt the same about the story device for the flashback – the handwriting and drawings became a distraction and took my focus off the action. Pretty visuals just aren’t enough to keep the film on track.

When Mani Ratnam wants to belt you over the head with a message about peace, unity, love and what makes a family, he can make Bono seem subtle. I give it 3 stars.

11 thoughts on “Kannathil Muthamittal

  1. I liked this movie a lot, although I do agree with many of the flaws noted here, especially Temple’s point that it seemed like Thiru just married Indra in order to create a family for Amudha. This was the 2nd or 3rd time that I’d seen JD Chakraborty in a supporting role where I was completely distracted (in a good way) by his performance. The scene with Shyama and Dileepan at the river that goes from playful, to sexy, to scary gets me every time.


    • Hi Liz,
      Indra even asks him that question which he doesn’t answer!
      Totally agree with you about the river scene, although I do also really like their first night – its really cute but still sexy 🙂


  2. “Amudha becomes bratty and rude as she deals with her feelings of alienation from her family and as a consequence I lose much of my sympathy for her. I also disagree with her parents’ decision to try and find her birth mother, no matter how essential it is to the plot.”

    Thank you, Heather! That is exactly the reason why I could not connect with this film, no matter how many people praised it to the skies. The idea of a mother and a father who are risking not just their lives (that I would understand) but also the life of their child (adopted or not) for what is essentially a whim is beyond me. The story lost me from that point on. The fact that Amudha was acting like a spoiled brat didn’t do much for me either from the sympathy perspective.

    But aside from that, it’s interesting to read about your life experiences and fascinating that you see things more from Shyama’s perspective. Honestly, in a very twisted way she was the only character that made sense and the resolution of the conflict surprisingly shows her far more cognisant of the consequences in Amudha’s life of such a decision than her own (irresponsible) parents. Seriously, what were they thinking?? Everyone seems to get it, hence everyone’s love for the film, but I just don’t understand: what were they hoping to achieve? :-/

    Simran and Prakash Raj did make me very happy though 🙂 And so did your review! 😀


    • Hi Dolce,
      Thanks! Great to know there are more people out there who think the same way 🙂
      I really didn’t get why two reasonably sensible people who seemed to have a happy home life and great family would just head off into what they knew was a dangerous situation – totally ridiculous. Plus I didn’t think it was a good idea to indulge Amudha in such a way – and certainly they didn’t seem to ever consider the effect on Shyama by just turning up out of the blue! What if she had a husband and family who knew nothing of her past for instance. I just found it all implausible, and like you had no real interest in their search!
      I do like the first half though – I think Simran is lovely in this, and I like Maddy in glasses 😀


  3. Hey, If you like Mani Ratnam’s films, you should watch “Thalapathi” which is based on the story of Arjuna-Karna-Duryodhana from the epic Mahabharata.

    I consider it to be his best film till date.


  4. nice to see ur interest in SI films.
    I think that it’s difficult/impossible for people to truly understand/appreciate/’get’ the film when it’s in a language they don’t understand/speak. It applies all people./any language.
    I know you know this, but let’s remind everyone that a film isn’t good/bad because one person thinks so.
    – The subtitles for the Tamil movies are really bad. They make a perfect example for the saying “message lost in translation”.
    – Having a good understanding of the Tamil culture/people would also help. I understand that you have spent time in Tamil areas. But it’s ofcourse not as good as someone who understands Tamil people/culture/language.

    I’ve said all this because I felt some of the Tamil movies you have reviewed were deserving of higher ratings.

    checkout these sites: http://TamilNet.com



    • Hi
      Thanks for your comment. The ratings I give movies are totally just my opinion and as you say don’t mean that a film is good or bad. It’s just a measure of how much I enjoyed the film and whether I would recommend it to my friends or not 🙂
      My trips to India, and the friends I have from the south of India have all added to my interest in the films from that area, but I don’t make any claim at all to understanding the culture. I still don’t understand Australian culture and I’ve been living here for over 10 years!
      I would love to learn some of the Tamil language and the subtitle issue is exactly why I started learning Hindi. Maybe some day I will have time, but I think it will take many years to learn such a complex language as Tamil.
      Thanks for your recommendations too 🙂


Say something!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.